lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2008]   [Jan]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf
[Miklos Szeredi - Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 10:29:21AM +0100]
| > | + /* is this correct? */
| > | + if (sbi->s_anchor[2] != 0)
| > | + seq_printf(seq, ",anchor=%u", sbi->s_anchor[2]);
| >
| > you know, I would prefer to use form UDF_SB_ANCHOR(sb)[2]
| > in sake of style unification but we should wait for Jan's
| > decision (i'm not the expert in this area ;)
|
| I think UDF_SB_ANCHOR macro was removed by some patch in -mm.
|
| I'm more interested if the second element of the s_anchor array really
| does always have the value of the 'anchor=N' mount option. I haven't
| been able to verify that fully. Do you have some insight into that?
|
| Thanks,
| Miklos
|

Hello Miklos,

well, actually - no. anchor entities can be set to 0 if we have been failed
to read them in udf_find_anchor(). So it seems you've to use some
additional flag to store it.

Btw, Miklos the patch is over -mm tree?

- Cyrill -


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2008-01-25 14:45    [W:0.123 / U:0.228 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site