Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [patch 25/26] mount options: fix udf | From | Miklos Szeredi <> | Date | Fri, 25 Jan 2008 10:29:21 +0100 |
| |
> | + /* is this correct? */ > | + if (sbi->s_anchor[2] != 0) > | + seq_printf(seq, ",anchor=%u", sbi->s_anchor[2]); > > you know, I would prefer to use form UDF_SB_ANCHOR(sb)[2] > in sake of style unification but we should wait for Jan's > decision (i'm not the expert in this area ;)
I think UDF_SB_ANCHOR macro was removed by some patch in -mm.
I'm more interested if the second element of the s_anchor array really does always have the value of the 'anchor=N' mount option. I haven't been able to verify that fully. Do you have some insight into that?
Thanks, Miklos
| |