Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: recent nfs change causes autofs regression | From | Ian Kent <> | Date | Thu, 06 Sep 2007 13:23:43 +0800 |
| |
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:50 +0100, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:37 +0100, David Howells wrote: > > Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote: > > > > > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example. > > > > I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount. Any > > flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must > > either result in a new superblock or be ignored. > > > > David > > We currently ignore remount requests that attempt to change the NFS > mount parameters. This is not new behaviour, BTW: it has always been the > case, and nobody has ever requested it.
Yes, I only mentioned it because I'm aware it.
I've not payed much attention to it because there haven't been any complaints so far and it's been a long time.
Ian
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |