lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
From
Date
On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 16:37 +0100, David Howells wrote:
> Ian Kent <raven@themaw.net> wrote:
>
> > But what about mounting with different protocol, tcp vs udp for example.
>
> I was referring specifically to the R/O / R/W variants of the same mount. Any
> flag variation that varies the way the NFS client talks to the NFS server must
> either result in a new superblock or be ignored.
>
> David

We currently ignore remount requests that attempt to change the NFS
mount parameters. This is not new behaviour, BTW: it has always been the
case, and nobody has ever requested it.

The ro flag is different, and I agree that it should be moved to the
vfsmount structure. I'm hoping Dave Hansen's patches will be ready for
merging soon...

Trond

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-05 17:55    [W:0.094 / U:0.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site