Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:51:56 -0400 | From | Dave Jones <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more} ARM/StrongARM |
| |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 10:31:42AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > OK, here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm3/broken-out/fix-x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch > > > > > > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386 > > > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks. > > > > Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box > > (which should be the same as a native build). > > Was that with allnoconfig?
yeah.
> > The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually > > exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f') > > Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ? > > Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended > up merging verion 56. It was awful.
heh.
I think just reverting that change for .23 makes sense. It doesn't seem that anything breaks by not having it there, and we know it definitly breaks arm at least.
Dave
-- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |