Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 10:31:42 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] Kernel compile bug in 2.6.22.6/7 {maybe more} ARM/StrongARM |
| |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:22:55 -0400 Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > OK, here: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.21-rc5/2.6.21-rc5-mm3/broken-out/fix-x86_64-mm-sched-clock-share.patch > > > > So I guess what we want to do here is to revert that patch, test i386 > > allnoconfig and then fix up anything which breaks. > > Nothing breaks for me with make ARCH=i386 bzImage on my x86-64 box > (which should be the same as a native build).
Was that with allnoconfig?
> The functions that complain in that patch header don't seem to actually > exist in mainline at all. (`init_sched_clock' and `call_r_s_f') > Did this patch perhaps jump the gun, and these are -mm only ?
Could be that this patch fixed version 17 of sched-clock-share and we ended up merging verion 56. It was awful. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |