lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Sep]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
Date
From
Subject[PATCH 3/5][9PFS] Use macro instead of explicit check for mandatory locks
The __MANDATORY_LOCK(inode) macro makes the same check, but
makes the code more readable.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org>
Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com>
Cc: Ron Minnich <rminnich@sandia.gov>
Cc: Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@ionkov.net>

---

fs/9p/vfs_file.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
index 2a40c29..7e75309 100644
--- a/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/9p/vfs_file.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static int v9fs_file_lock(struct file *f
P9_DPRINTK(P9_DEBUG_VFS, "filp: %p lock: %p\n", filp, fl);

/* No mandatory locks */
- if ((inode->i_mode & (S_ISGID | S_IXGRP)) == S_ISGID)
+ if (__MANDATORY_LOCK(inode))
return -ENOLCK;

if ((IS_SETLK(cmd) || IS_SETLKW(cmd)) && fl->fl_type != F_UNLCK) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-09-12 13:29    [W:0.025 / U:0.216 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site