Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Aug 2007 13:44:31 -0700 (PDT) | From | Christoph Lameter <> | Subject | Re: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups? |
| |
On Sun, 12 Aug 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> > > /* > > > * Maximum threshold is 125 > > > */ > > > threshold = min(125, threshold); > > > > > > as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the code. > > > Added Andrew Morton to the CC for that. > > > > Yes, that's inconsistent. And looking at Christoph's df9ecaba it's unclear > > whether the comment is wrong or the code is wrong. The code is wrong, I > > expect.
?? What is wrong with the code? We want the threshold to stay below 125?
> On 08/12/2007 05:29 AM, Roland Dreier wrote: > > > What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the current > > value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the > > maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is > > 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is > > 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct.
Exactly.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |