lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Aug]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Are we properly prepared to handle 3 Socket setups?
On 08/12/2007 10:35 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 05:17:10 +0200 Rene Herman <rene.herman@gmail.com> wrote:

>> The line just below where it does that _does_ seem to have a problem:
>>
>> /*
>> * Maximum threshold is 125
>> */
>> threshold = min(125, threshold);
>>
>> as either the comment or the code is wrong and it seems it's the code. Added
>> Andrew Morton to the CC for that.
>
> Yes, that's inconsistent. And looking at Christoph's df9ecaba it's unclear
> whether the comment is wrong or the code is wrong. The code is wrong, I
> expect.

Extremely friendly of you to pretend I wasn't being thick at all but don't
worry, I can take it. Anyways, since Christoph wasn't in CC on that one:

On 08/12/2007 05:29 AM, Roland Dreier wrote:

> What's the problem? That line sets threshold to the smaller of the
> current value or 125, which is exactly what one would want to do if the
> maximum value is 125. Just do a couple of examples: eg if threshold is
> 100 going into that line, then the value is left alone; if threshold is
> 150 then it gets set to 125; and that seems exactly correct.

Rene.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-08-12 22:07    [W:0.045 / U:0.100 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site