Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 08 Jun 2007 18:27:04 +0200 | From | Martin Peschke <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > Firstly, submit cleanup patches that _do not change the output_. If you > have any output changes, do it as a separate patch, ontop of the cleanup > patch. Mixing material changes and cleanups into a single patch is a > basic patch submission mistake that will only earn you NACKs.
Let's put this straight: it has not been my primary goal to clean it up. I have posted an alternative implementation. One of the good things about the alternative implementation is lines-of-savings through code sharing.
Don't hear me say my code is perfect. As anybody else here I am relying on reviews and feedback in order to make it good enough.
I think there has been enough duplication to consider a component that statistics data is handed over to.
Martin
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |