Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Jun 2007 09:30:21 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] [Patch 4/4] lock contention tracking slimmed down |
| |
* Martin Peschke <mp3@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> Bill Huey (hui) wrote: > > There are roughly about 400 locks in a normal kernel for a desktop. The > > list is rather cumbersome anyways so, IMO, it really should be handled > > by parsing tools, etc... There could be more properties attached to each > > lock especially if you intend to get this to work on -rt which need more > > things reported. > > Adding stuff to an already wide table in a readable fashion is more > difficult than making a list longer. > > Do mean I might submit this stuff for -rt?
Firstly, submit cleanup patches that _do not change the output_. If you have any output changes, do it as a separate patch, ontop of the cleanup patch. Mixing material changes and cleanups into a single patch is a basic patch submission mistake that will only earn you NACKs.
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |