lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: pci.h stubs (was: EDD build error)
> > So the answer is "yes" we should then, and move from pci_get_bus_and_slot
> > to pci_get_bus_domain_and_slot() [or just add an argument]. The point of
> > the functions is to be easy to use, so it should be handled internally.
>
> My point was that code which doesn't currently keep the bus pointer to
> hand should keep the bus pointer to hand instead of the bus number.
> That's easier to use, particularly if you want to actually do any pci
> config accesses.

If you've got the bus pointer yes. If you don't then teaching
pci_get_bus_and_slot() to handle it makes sense.

Another problem here - which bus has the legacy decode mappings ? That
will matter for ATA which also uses pci_get_bus_and_slot...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-06-27 17:05    [W:0.049 / U:2.388 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site