Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 10:36:20 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) |
| |
* Tobias Gerschner <tobias.gerschner@gmail.com> wrote:
> I did run massive_intr.c for 60 secs with increasing nproc ( > 10,20,30,40,50,60) waiting for effects. > > Below a small table of the results > > 2.6.21.1-cfs-v16 > > nproc , usability result > > 10 , serious frame drops , Firefox hardly recognizes clicked links, > but still usable > 20 - 30, usability loss ( somehow under cfs firefox never finished > user requests like displaying web pages or opening new pages , no > feedback anymore, sudden changes on the desktop )
ouch! The expected load-testing result under CFS should be something like this:
http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-June/007817.html
could you send me the output of /proc/sched_debug? (while say a "massive_intr 20" is running?)
Roughly what hardware do you have? (could you send me your lspci -v output and dmesg output?)
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |