Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: call for more SD versus CFS comparisons (was: Re: [ck] Mainline plans) | Date | Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:36:18 -0400 | From | "Fortier,Vincent [Montreal]" <> |
| |
> -----Message d'origine----- > De : linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org > [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] De la part de > Miguel Figueiredo > Envoyé : 11 juin 2007 20:30 > > Hi all, > > some results based on massing_intr.c by Satoru, can be found > on http://people.redhat.com/mingo/cfs-scheduler/tools/massive_intr.c > > > I know that other people, who read lkml, also tested the same > way, it would be nice if they also post their data. >
For the pleasure of comparing CPU schedulers, both CFS v16 & full CK2 patched pre-built kernels for Fedora 7 using latest build 3194 are now available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca
There is also a not yet fully tuned YUM repository configuration file available at http://linux-dev.qc.ec.gc.ca/kernel/fedora/alt-sched.repo Although I suggest you download the rpm's directly from the web page & install both manually using rpm -ivh --force
Have fun.
- vin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |