Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Date | Fri, 18 May 2007 05:19:11 -0600 | From | Matthew Wilcox <> | Subject | Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning |
| |
On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you > _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread > and trying to convince you ad infinitum.
Right. It's a matter of taste. What makes you think you have taste?
I don't think that the module solution is perfect. But abusing the module parameters is a worse idea. sysfs just isn't a good fit for this, according to my taste.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |