lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [May]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Asynchronous scsi scanning
    On 5/18/07, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
    > On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 09:11:58AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
    > > It's also somewhat a matter of *taste* (and hence subjective), if you
    > > _still_ don't get it, Matthew, then there's no point continuing this thread
    > > and trying to convince you ad infinitum.
    >
    > Right. It's a matter of taste. What makes you think you have taste?

    Well, my stand uptil now has been to consider as many options as
    possible. I have certainly not married myself to just one particular way
    of doing this -- but I bet that the one way that I do _dislike_, the dummy
    module one, would not be found tasteful / best by most people around
    (yourself included, as you say).

    > I don't think that the module solution is perfect. But abusing the
    > module parameters is a worse idea. sysfs just isn't a good fit for this,
    > according to my taste.

    The whole point is to at least _consider_ other alternatives. And I've
    found your attitude so far to have been extremely blocking / difficult.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2007-05-18 15:09    [W:5.829 / U:0.512 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site