Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 15 May 2007 16:28:34 -0700 | From | Arjan van de Ven <> | Subject | Re: Asynchronous scsi scanning |
| |
Satyam Sharma wrote: >> > >semantics of it (read-only? read-write? write-only? > > Well, it _has_ to be write, don't really care if it's read-write or > write-only. I would still prefer read-write, but we can go ahead with > write-only too. It doesn't really matter, does it?
just to be devils advocate... it should be a read that returns when done, and that can be polled - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |