lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Mar]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: RSDL v0.31
From
Date
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 06:56 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-16 at 21:24 -0700, Nicholas Miell wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I haven't really been following this thread and now I'm confused.
> >
> > You're saying that it's somehow the scheduler's fault that X isn't
> > running with a high enough priority?
>
> I'm saying that the current scheduler adjusts for interactive loads,
> this new one doesn't. I'm seeing interactivity regressions, and they
> are not fixed with nice unless nice is used to maximum effect. I'm
> saying yes, I can lower my expectations, but no I don't want to.
>
> A four line summary is as short as I can make it.
>
> -Mike

Uh, no. Essentially, the current scheduler works around X's brokenness,
in an often unpredictable manner.

RSDL appears to be completely deterministic, which is a very strong
virtue.

The X people have plans for how to go about fixing this, but until then,
there's no reason to hold up kernel development.

--
Nicholas Miell <nmiell@comcast.net>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-03-17 07:29    [W:2.431 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site