Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 19 Mar 2007 00:45:30 +0200 (EET) | From | Szonyi Calin <> | Subject | Re: RSDL v0.31 |
| |
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Lee Revell wrote:
> On 3/17/07, Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote: >> P.S. "utter failure" was too harsh. What sticks in my craw is that the >> world has to adjust to fit this new scheduler. > > I have never seen X run nearly as smooth as our favorite proprietary > OS on similar spec hardware with ANY scheduler. >
i have never seen Windows (or were you talking about Mac OSX ?) run smooth. Win2k (scheduler) is almost usable if your computer is very fast but on common hardware every version of windows for me was a joke. or maybe you have a special version ;) [1]
I don't run KDE or Gnome in linux so ... maybe that's the problem ;)
[1] And no, i don't consider waiting 2-5-20-50 seconds for a program to start a feature. YMMV
--
"frate, trezeste-te, aici nu-i razboiul stelelor" Radu R. pe offtopic at lug.ro
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |