Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 20 Dec 2007 07:23:11 -0500 | From | Tony Camuso <> | Subject | [Fwd: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF] |
| |
To all,
The next few forwarded messages comprise my responses to Greg's questions about the patch I submitted to deal with pci devices that do not respond correctly to x86 mmconf accesses.
Please accept my apologies for not having including the community in my original responses.
-------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5]PCI: x86 MMCONFIG: introduce PCI_USING_MMCONF Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2007 18:58:45 -0500 From: Tony Camuso <tcamuso@redhat.com> Reply-To: tcamuso@redhat.com To: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> References: <20071219221746.20362.39243.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com> <20071219221751.20362.23451.sendpatchset@dhcp83-188.boston.redhat.com> <20071219230447.GA24219@suse.de>
Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 05:17:51PM -0500, tcamuso@redhat.com wrote: >> >> +extern struct pci_ops pci_legacy_ops; /* direct.c */ > > This isn't needed in this patch at all, and might make the compiler > confused if you were to build with only this patch present :( > > thanks, > > greg k-h
Yes, of course. I missed that. Thank you.
Should I resubmit that one patch? Or would you prefer I resubmit the whole patch set?
| |