Messages in this thread | | | From | David Howells <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 08/28] SECURITY: Allow kernel services to override LSM settings for task actions [try #2] | Date | Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:44:18 +0000 |
| |
Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> wrote:
> That happens to me when interfaces are described in SELinux terms. I > still don't care much for multiple contexts, and I don't have a good > grasp of how you'll deal with Smack, or any LSM other than SELinux.
Me neither. I understand SELinux somewhat, though it's got a lot of wibbly bits, and WinNT's security system, but I have no experience of the other stuff.
> Just as Stephen mentions, I also don't see the generality that a change > of this magnitude really ought to provide.
Perhaps it should be a specific interface, solely for cachefiles's use then.
David
| |