Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:50:20 -0800 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ? |
| |
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote: >>> >>>> Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should just >>>> *work* with sensible defaults. I don't use an initrd, or an initramfs, >>>> and have no intention of ever doing so. >>> nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of a >>> bzImage too? Am i wrong? >>> >> Nope. It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is >> linked into the kernel binary. > > would be nice to have a single-image variant for all of this. having the > separate initrd was always trouble - and it's pointless as well. (we > rarely update the initrd without updating the vmlinuz as well) >
We do. Am I missing something?
-hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |