Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 21 Nov 2007 00:47:25 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: CONFIG_IRQBALANCE for 64-bit x86 ? |
| |
* H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar wrote: >> * Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca> wrote: >> >>> Perhaps, but this also violates the principle that the kernel should just >>> *work* with sensible defaults. I don't use an initrd, or an initramfs, >>> and have no intention of ever doing so. >> >> nor do i - i was under the impression that klibc was able to work out of a >> bzImage too? Am i wrong? >> > > Nope. It runs inside an initramfs, of course; that initramfs is > linked into the kernel binary.
would be nice to have a single-image variant for all of this. having the separate initrd was always trouble - and it's pointless as well. (we rarely update the initrd without updating the vmlinuz as well)
Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |