lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2007]   [Jan]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: can someone explain "inline" once and for all?
Date
"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com> writes:

> first, there appear to be three possible ways of specifying an
> inline routine in the kernel source:
>
> $ grep -r "static inline " .
> $ grep -r "static __inline__ " .
> $ grep -r "static __inline " .
>
> i vaguely recall that this has something to do with a distinction
> between C99 inline and gcc inline

No, it doesn't (there is no C99 compatible inline in gcc before 4.3). It
has to do with the fact that inline is not a keyword in C89, so you need
to use a different spelling when you want to stay compatible with strict
C89.

Andreas.

--
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
PGP key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2007-01-19 15:23    [W:0.046 / U:5.048 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site