Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 19 Jan 2007 09:00:38 -0500 (EST) | From | "Robert P. J. Day" <> | Subject | Re: can someone explain "inline" once and for all? |
| |
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com> writes: > > > but in terms of strict C89 compatibility, it would seem to be a bit > > late for that given: > > > > $ grep -r "static inline " . > > > > no? > > The kernel does not use strict C89, it uses GNUC89.
in that case, why did you just waste my time and all that bandwidth by writing in your previous post:
"... so you need to use a different spelling when you want to stay compatible with strict C89."
please do me a favour and don't post another reply until you go back and actually read my original question.
rday - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |