Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [Suspend2-devel] Re: uswsusp history lesson | From | Alan Cox <> | Date | Sat, 08 Jul 2006 18:39:23 +0100 |
| |
Ar Sad, 2006-07-08 am 18:43 +0200, ysgrifennodd Olivier Galibert: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2006 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: > > Very often, choice is good. but for something this fundamental, it is > > not. We also don't have 2 scsi layers for example. > > We have 2 ide layers, 2 usb-storage drivers, 2 sound systems and we
(We've had effectively two SCSI layers before now btw when we've done transitions from old_eh to new_eh)
> have had 2 pcmcia subsystems and 2 usb subsystems. At one point, it's > the only way to find out what will work out. Suspend2 and uswsusp > have very different fundamental designs, and it's quite unclear at > that point which one is the right one.
I'd like to see this cleared up at OLS/Kernel summit.
Alan
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |