Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | Date | Tue, 4 Apr 2006 14:01:40 -0700 | From | "Randy.Dunlap" <> | Subject | Re: [patch 1/1] sys_sync_file_range() |
| |
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006 13:50:55 -0700 Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 11:41:11PM -0800, akpm@osdl.org wrote: > > @@ -318,8 +318,9 @@ > > #define __NR_unshare 310 > > #define __NR_set_robust_list 311 > > #define __NR_get_robust_list 312 > > +#define __NR_sys_sync_file_range 313 > > What's up with the __NR_sys_yada_yada? Except for recent entries (kexec, > splice, and now sync_file_range) all of the other names in here have > dropped the "sys_". > > Is it too late to fix __NR_sys_kexec_load (since it is out in the > wild now?)
already been done: (copy-n-paste warning here:) ~~~~~
On i386, we don't use sys_ prefix for __NR_*. This patch removes it. [FWIW, _syscall*() macros will generate foo() instead of sys_foo().]
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp> ---
include/asm-i386/unistd.h | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff -puN include/asm-i386/unistd.h~remove-sys_-prefix include/asm-i386/unistd.h --- linux-2.6/include/asm-i386/unistd.h~remove-sys_-prefix 2006-04-02 05:23:57.000000000 +0900 +++ linux-2.6-hirofumi/include/asm-i386/unistd.h 2006-04-02 05:24:10.000000000 +0900 @@ -318,8 +318,8 @@ #define __NR_unshare 310 #define __NR_set_robust_list 311 #define __NR_get_robust_list 312 -#define __NR_sys_splice 313 -#define __NR_sys_sync_file_range 314 +#define __NR_splice 313 +#define __NR_sync_file_range 314 #define NR_syscalls 315
--- ~Randy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |