Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 23 Mar 2006 17:48:58 -0500 | From | Mark Lord <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code |
| |
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. Further, > it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement. > Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to > behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.
I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use an awful lot of memory for book-keeping. So count that as encouragement to improve the performance when you can.
> Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any > patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be > tested for as long as this code, in -mm.
It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel.
He really is trying to help, you know.
Cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |