lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Mar]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] swsusp: separate swap-writing/reading code
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> I agree it probably may be improved. Still it seems to be good enough. Further,
> it's more efficient than the previous solution, so I consider it as an improvement.
> Also this code has been tested for quite some time in -mm and appears to
> behave properly, at least we haven't got any bug reports related to it so far.

I find the in-kernel swsusp to be quite slow, and it seems to use
an awful lot of memory for book-keeping. So count that as encouragement
to improve the performance when you can.

> Currently I'm not working on any better solution. If you can provide any
> patches to implement one, please submit them, but I think they'll have to be
> tested for as long as this code, in -mm.

It would be *really nice* if you guys could stop being so underhandedly
nasty in every single reply to anything from Nigel.

He really is trying to help, you know.

Cheers
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-03-23 23:51    [W:1.676 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site