lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation.
Quoting Herbert Poetzl (herbert@13thfloor.at):
> > 3) How do we refer to namespaces and containers when we are not members?
> > - Do we refer to them indirectly by processes or other objects that
> > we can see and are members?
>
> the process will be an unique identifier to the
> namespace, but it might not be easy to use it, so
> IMHO it might at least make sense to ...

Especially from userspace. If I want to start a checkpoint on a
container, but I have to use the process to identify the
container/namespace, well I can't uniquely specify the process by pid
anymore...

-serge
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-08 15:44    [W:0.151 / U:0.628 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site