Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 8 Feb 2006 09:17:26 -0600 | From | "Serge E. Hallyn" <> | Subject | Re: The issues for agreeing on a virtualization/namespaces implementation. |
| |
Quoting Hubertus Franke (frankeh@watson.ibm.com): > Eric W. Biederman wrote: > So it seems the clone( flags ) is a reasonable approach to create new > namespaces. Question is what is the initial state of each namespace? > In pidspace we know we should be creating an empty pidmap ! > In network, someone suggested creating a loopback device > In uts, create "localhost" > Are there examples where we rather inherit ? Filesystem ?
Of course filesystem is already implemented, and does inheret a full copy.
-serge - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |