Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 26 Feb 2006 18:32:44 -0500 | From | Chuck Ebbert <> | Subject | Re: OOM-killer too aggressive? |
| |
In-Reply-To: <20060226203917.GA76858@muc.de>
On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 at 21:39:17 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:21:52AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com> wrote: > > > > > > Chris Largret is getting repeated OOM kills because of DMA memory > > > exhaustion: > > > > > > oom-killer: gfp_mask=0xd1, order=3 > > > > > > > This could be related to the known GFP_DMA oom on some x86_64 machines. > > What known GFP_DMA oom? GFP_DMA allocation should work.
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113895864600001&r=1&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=113766047000002&r=1&w=2
-- Chuck "Equations are the Devil's sentences." --Stephen Colbert
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |