lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
Joerg Schilling wrote:

>>Could you explain why stat->st_dev / stat->st_ino POSIX semantics forces
>>POSIX implementations to have a stable stat->st_rdev number?
>>
>>
>
>I was never talking about stat->st_rdev
>
>
This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143

On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:

Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
> The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to
POSIX?

Correct.

Jörg


You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were
talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an
outright lie.

--
fm
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-02-13 16:39    [W:0.339 / U:1.176 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site