Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:36:00 -0500 | From | Florin Malita <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>Could you explain why stat->st_dev / stat->st_ino POSIX semantics forces >>POSIX implementations to have a stable stat->st_rdev number? >> >> > >I was never talking about stat->st_rdev > > This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev: http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143
On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote: > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to POSIX?
Correct.
Jörg
You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an outright lie.
-- fm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |