lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest)
    >> This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev:
    >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143
    >>
    >> On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote:
    >>
    >> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote:
    >> > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to
    >> > POSIX?
    >>
    >> Correct.
    >>
    >> Jörg
    >>
    >>
    >> You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were
    >> talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an
    >> outright lie.
    >
    >You are lying here.
    >
    >I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that
    >I was referring to st_dev.
    >
    Exactly. But I asked specifically about Rdev... see "stable too"
    (=German: "Muss st_rdev auch stabil sein?")



    Jan Engelhardt
    --
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2006-02-13 17:43    [W:4.097 / U:0.208 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site