Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 13 Feb 2006 17:38:59 +0100 (MET) | From | Jan Engelhardt <> | Subject | Re: CD writing in future Linux (stirring up a hornets' nest) |
| |
>> This is blatantly incorrect. You *were* talking about stat->st_rdev: >> http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/10/143 >> >> On 2/10/06, *Joerg Schilling* <schilling@fokus.fraunhofer.de> wrote: >> >> Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de> wrote: >> > The struct stat->st_rdev field need to be stable too to comply to >> > POSIX? >> >> Correct. >> >> Jörg >> >> >> You may claim you *never meant to* or you *never realized* you were >> talking about, but you can't say you never talked about it - that's an >> outright lie. > >You are lying here. > >I did not write st_rdev and from my previous mail it was obvioys that >I was referring to st_dev. > Exactly. But I asked specifically about Rdev... see "stable too" (=German: "Muss st_rdev auch stabil sein?")
Jan Engelhardt -- | |