Messages in this thread | | | From | Dmitry Mishin <> | Subject | Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework | Date | Wed, 22 Nov 2006 16:34:03 +0300 |
| |
On Wednesday 22 November 2006 11:43, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > Dmitry Mishin <dim@openvz.org> writes: > > > On Tuesday 21 November 2006 21:01, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >> Kirill Korotaev wrote: > >> > Cedric, > >> > > >> > Dmitry Mishin and Daniel Lezcano are working together on the full > >> > network namespace incorporating both needs of OpenVZ and VServer/IBM. > >> > > >> > Thanks, > >> > Kirill > >> > >> Kirill, > >> > >> We will need this framework to move the network isolation code to the > >> ns_proxy/net_namespace structure. So if Cedric gives us a empty > >> framework it is fine, except if someone does not agree with it... > >> > >> -- Daniel. > > This patch looks acceptable for us. > > BTW, Daniel, we agreed to be based on the Andrey's patchset. I do not see a > > reason, why Cedric force us to make some unnecessary work and move existent > > patchset over his interface. > > If you are going to take that attitude. Where was this conversation? > > It appears several relevant people were not aware of this development > discussion. So when it comes up for general review you can expect your > approach as well as your code to be critiqued. Eric,
please read and comment Daniel's summary: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=116352117000763&w=2
Seems, that you missed it.
-- Thanks, Dmitry. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |