Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 22 Nov 2006 17:57:52 +0100 | From | Cedric Le Goater <> | Subject | Re: [patch -mm] net namespace: empty framework |
| |
> Where is Andrey's patch?
The last I saw was on 2.6.18-rc4-mm1 :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115572448503723&w=2
>> the spirit of uts and ipc namespace (and user namespace if that reaches the >> kernel one day :) so that's why i made the small changes. > > I agree the namespace frameworks should be consistent, but i don't know > whether Andrey's is or not. I'd like to have the framework included so > we reduce the number of silly rewrites due to clone flag collisions etc.
yes. it is a pain to maintain.
>> It also helping the nsproxy/namespace syscalls to have a similar interface >> to manipulate namespaces. who knows, soon we might be able to have a 'struct >> namespace' with a ops field to define new namespace types ? >> >> I can also send a empty framework for user namespace ;) > > Please do - then I'll rebase the patchset I sent to the containes list > onto your patch, and resubmit the whole userns.
I'll send a refreshed version of both in the next round.
C.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |