lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2006]   [Jan]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRE: My vote against eepro* removal
Date
From
From: Evgeniy Polyakov
> Just a hack:
>
> --- drivers/net/e100.c.1 2006-01-20 13:39:19.000000000 +0300
> +++ drivers/net/e100.c 2006-01-20 14:15:40.000000000 +0300
> @@ -879,8 +879,8 @@
>
> writel((reg << 16) | (addr << 21) | dir | data,
> &nic->csr->mdi_ctrl);
>
> - for(i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
> - udelay(20);
> + for(i = 0; i < 1000; i++) {
> + udelay(2);
> if((data_out = readl(&nic->csr->mdi_ctrl)) & mdi_ready)
> break;
> }

My test environment and software is not precise enough for small
improvements, but I'd say this results in a 10-15 % improvement
(i.e. something like 50 us shorter delay) on the average.

To be sure, one would have to take and print tsc timestamps directly
in the watchdog code, but printk's mess up my timings.

--
Klaus Kusche (Software Development - Control Systems)
KEBA AG Gewerbepark Urfahr, A-4041 Linz, Austria (Europe)
Tel: +43 / 732 / 7090-3120 Fax: +43 / 732 / 7090-6301
E-Mail: kus@keba.com WWW: www.keba.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2006-01-20 12:30    [W:0.343 / U:0.368 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site