Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:21:53 -0700 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel |
| |
Jens Axboe wrote:
> >Seeing as you are the one that is apparently bothered by the misnomer, >it follows that you would be the one submitting a patch for this. Not >that it would be accepted though, I don't see much point in renaming >functions and breaking drivers just because of a slightly bad name. The >io schedulers are all called foo-iosched.c, it's only the simple core >api that uses the 'elevator' description. > > > He asked for an example of messy code, I gave one. Nate can give details on other messiness in that code.
Reiser4 has flaws also....
Give all the code time, and it will improve. The "elevator" code has gotten a LOT better. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |