Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Lorenzo Allegrucci <> | Subject | Re: I request inclusion of reiser4 in the mainline kernel | Date | Tue, 20 Sep 2005 15:30:01 +0200 |
| |
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 13:42, Jens Axboe wrote: > On Tue, Sep 20 2005, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>The name for one. There is no elevator algorithm anywhere in it. There > > >>is a least block number first algorithm that was called an elevator, but > > >> > > >> > > > > > >Well the terminology changed to "io scheduler" now, however the > > >residual "elevator" name found in places doesn't cause anyone > > >any problems and there isn't much reason to change it other than > > >the desire to break things. > > > > > > > > Did you really say that? I mean, come on, can't you at least manage a > > "well, it ought to get changed but I am busy with something more > > exciting to me". > > Seeing as you are the one that is apparently bothered by the misnomer, > it follows that you would be the one submitting a patch for this. Not > that it would be accepted though, I don't see much point in renaming > functions and breaking drivers just because of a slightly bad name. The > io schedulers are all called foo-iosched.c, it's only the simple core > api that uses the 'elevator' description.
Why not just rename the kernel option "elevator" to "iosched" ?
--- elevator.c 2005-09-20 15:26:19.000000000 +0200 +++ elevator.c.iosched 2005-09-20 15:27:11.000000000 +0200 @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ return 0; }
-__setup("elevator=", elevator_setup); +__setup("iosched=", elevator_setup);
int elevator_init(request_queue_t *q, char *name) { - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |