Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:29:39 +0200 | From | Voluspa <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.13-rc3 Battery times at 100/250/1000 Hz = Zero difference |
| |
On 2005-07-26 5:23:08 Len Brown wrote:
>than C1 and the generic ACPI code doesn't support it, >then it is either a Linux/ACPI bug or a BIOS bug -- file away:-)
The issue has made me fume enough to contemplating installing windos for the first time in some 10 years. But I'll persevere. Will learn ACPI-speak, read bios- and kernelcode. Then return, have no fear (even if just to admit that the BIOS is buggy). Speaking of bugs, I was directed, off-list, to the patch which mends your latest chip-away of C2/C3 for many systems:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=acpi4linux&m=112138186129178&w=2
It did however not fix my K8 system.
>I.e. The whole concept of ACPI is that you shoulud _not_ need >a platform specific driver to accomplish this.
Indeed. It's supposed to be some kind of neutral non-discrimatory standard... I suppose.
Mvh Mats Johannesson -- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |