lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Jul]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectVariable ticks
I was thinking about variable tick times, and I can think of three 
classes of action needing CPU attention.
- device interrupts, which occur at no predictable time but would pull
the CPU out of a HLT or low power state.
- process sleeps of various kinds, which have a known time of occurence.
- polled devices...

Question one, are there other actions to consider?

Question two, what about those polled devices?

I've been asked to give a high level overview of the recent discussion
for a meeting, and while I want to keep it at the level of "slower
clock, fewer interrupts" and "faster clock, better sleep resolution," I
don't want to leave out any important issues, or be asked a question
(like how to handle polling devices) when I have no idea what people are
thinking in an area.

--
-bill davidsen (davidsen@tmr.com)
"The secret to procrastination is to put things off until the
last possible moment - but no longer" -me
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-07-25 20:58    [W:0.036 / U:0.572 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site