Messages in this thread | ![/](/images/icornerl.gif) | | Subject | RE: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup | Date | Thu, 21 Apr 2005 23:43:57 +0800 | From | "Zou, Nanhai" <> |
| |
Isn't that a !test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT) in my patch?
Zou Nan hai
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@suse.de] > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2005 7:51 PM > To: Zou, Nanhai > Cc: Andi Kleen; discuss@x86-64.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Siddha, > Suresh B > Subject: Re: [discuss] [Patch] X86_64 TASK_SIZE cleanup > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2005 at 01:17:40AM +0800, Zou, Nanhai wrote: > > Hi Andi, > > What is your comment on this patch? > > There is at least one wrong change in there, you have a check > for test_thread_flag(TIF_IA32) && (flags & MAP_32BIT) > > and that is wrong because MAP_32BIT is used from 64bit code > > -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ![\](/images/icornerr.gif) |