lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2005]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken
Date
Yes. should not use prink(ERR.... 

YH

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andi Kleen [mailto:ak@muc.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:22 PM
> To: YhLu
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: node_to_cpumask x86_64 broken
>
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2005 at 10:30:51PM -0800, YhLu wrote:
> > forget about it. I found the reason: I only put node 0 has
> RAM installed.
>
> There is some problem with this code - it complains on a few machines.
> However it's relatively harmless when this happens, so I
> haven't looked it yet. Should perhaps take out the printk.
>
> -Andi
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:10    [W:0.490 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site