Messages in this thread | | | Subject | RE: Killing POSIX deadlock detection | Date | Sun, 6 Jun 2004 08:24:24 -0700 | From | "Lever, Charles" <> |
| |
> So, final call. Any objections to never returning -EDEADLCK?
not an objection, but a consideration.
is this a change that belongs in 2.6? it does significantly change the behavior of the system call API, and could "break" applications.
unless this fixes a significant bug, perhaps it should wait for 2.7? that would give fair warning to developers who need to fix their broken programs. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |