Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 9 May 2004 02:36:21 -0700 | From | Andrew Morton <> | Subject | Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory |
| |
"Peter J. Braam" <braam@clusterfs.com> wrote: > > > Hi Andrew, > > I would just like to say that I have no difficulties with intermezzo being > rm -rf'd. There are probably only a handful of users. > > In the past 4 years nobody has supported InterMezzo sufficiently for it to > become successful. I have been fortunate to get really good support for the > Lustre project. So I have focussed on that. Lustre 1.X has become really > solid. > > The disconnected operation, caching and mirroring functionality of > InterMezzo will become available in Lustre as a new feature in version 2. > > So I see no point in keeping InterMezzo if it is a nuisance. > > I am also entirely happy to ask my one part time InterMezzo programmer to do > a better job of repeatedly sending pathes until they are in. > > Please guide me along. Thanks! >
Thanks - such opportunities are all too rare.
Are there any distro people out there who have a significant Intermezzo user base, or who see any problems with this? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |