Messages in this thread | | | From | "Peter J. Braam" <> | Subject | RE: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory | Date | Sun, 9 May 2004 17:01:54 +0800 |
| |
Hi Andrew,
I would just like to say that I have no difficulties with intermezzo being rm -rf'd. There are probably only a handful of users.
In the past 4 years nobody has supported InterMezzo sufficiently for it to become successful. I have been fortunate to get really good support for the Lustre project. So I have focussed on that. Lustre 1.X has become really solid.
The disconnected operation, caching and mirroring functionality of InterMezzo will become available in Lustre as a new feature in version 2.
So I see no point in keeping InterMezzo if it is a nuisance.
I am also entirely happy to ask my one part time InterMezzo programmer to do a better job of repeatedly sending pathes until they are in.
Please guide me along. Thanks!
- Peter -
> -----Original Message----- > From: intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net > [mailto:intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On > Behalf Of Arjan van de Ven > Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:22 PM > To: Anton Blanchard > Cc: akpm@osdl.org; intermezzo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory > > On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this: > > I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now... >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |