lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [May]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory
Date

Hi Andrew,

I would just like to say that I have no difficulties with intermezzo being
rm -rf'd. There are probably only a handful of users.

In the past 4 years nobody has supported InterMezzo sufficiently for it to
become successful. I have been fortunate to get really good support for the
Lustre project. So I have focussed on that. Lustre 1.X has become really
solid.

The disconnected operation, caching and mirroring functionality of
InterMezzo will become available in Lustre as a new feature in version 2.

So I see no point in keeping InterMezzo if it is a nuisance.

I am also entirely happy to ask my one part time InterMezzo programmer to do
a better job of repeatedly sending pathes until they are in.

Please guide me along. Thanks!

- Peter -


> -----Original Message-----
> From: intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net
> [mailto:intermezzo-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net] On
> Behalf Of Arjan van de Ven
> Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 4:22 PM
> To: Anton Blanchard
> Cc: akpm@osdl.org; intermezzo-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: 9/10 intermezzos prefer eating memory
>
> On Sun, 2004-05-02 at 10:00, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Im sure the 4kB stack brigade wont be too happy about this:
>
> I thought intermezzo would have been rm -rf'd by now...
>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:03    [W:0.106 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site