lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Apr]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Blacklist binary-only modules lying about their license
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Jorge Bernal (Koke) wrote:
> On Martes, 27 de Abril de 2004 20:54, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 19:53:39 +0200, Grzegorz Kulewski said:
> > > Maybe kernel should display warning only once per given licence or even
> > > once per boot (who needs warning about tainting tainted kernel?)
> >
> > If your kernel is tainted by 3 different modules, it saves you 2 reboots
> > when trying to replicate a problem with an untainted kernel.
> >
>
> what about something like a /proc/tainted list of modules?

I think that /proc/tainted would be better than spamming logs after each
load of tainted module...
But probably modules should not be removed from /proc/tainted on unloading
(to prevent from "un-tainting" the kernel by "clever" users).


Grzegorz Kulewski

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:02    [W:1.576 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site