Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 17 Apr 2004 20:53:22 +0200 | From | Mario Vanoni <> | Subject | IMHO the usability of 2.6 |
| |
Tested 2.6.1[-mm#] and 2.6.5[-aa#]: inexplicables crashes, mouse, NFS etc., on 2-3 of our 8 Linux machines (0.1-6 years old), not usable for production, need five 9 (99.999). I don't have logs, always switched back to 2.4.25.
Starting with AT&T UNIX SVR2 (1986, rock solid), later Linux 2.0, then 2.2, then 2.4, 2.4.17 was the 1st veritable stable 2.4 kernel. 2.4.25 had an uptime >=33 days before changing all machines to 2.4.26. Stable since 1-3 days.
Feedback only and kind regards
Mario Vanoni, _not_ in lkml!
PS The standalone 9th M$ machine at job, boot each morning, some days needs 1-3 reboots on the same day. From the view point five 9 a piece of jewellery.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |