Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:04:52 -0800 | From | Hans Reiser <> | Subject | Re: Reiser4 needs more testers |
| |
This was the parallel fsync benchmark?
Hans
markw@osdl.org wrote:
>I've run through another test on STP with the latest snapshot against >reiser4 and reiserfs for comparison. Reiser4 still seems to be lagging >behind reiserfs in our DBT-2 workload (the bigger number is better in >the metric): > > metric url to test results > ------ --------------------------------- >reiser4 1208 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290774/ >reiserfs 1819 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290775/ > >Mark > >On 26 Mar, Hans Reiser wrote: > > >>We have one NFS related bug remaining, and one mmap all of memory >>related bug (and performance issue) that you can hit using iozone. We >>will fix both of these in next week's snapshot, they were both multi-day >>bug fixes. When they are fixed, unless users/distros find bugs next >>week we will submit it for inclusion in the -mm and then the official >>kernel. >> >>We hope it is now fairly stable for average users if you avoid those two >>issues (we need to get rid of those dire warnings about its >>stability...., we will remember that next snapshot....;-) ) >> >>We need a lot more real user testers, because we have run out of scripts >>that can crash it, and there are distros that would like to ship it >>soon. Please also complain to vitaly@namesys.com and ramon@namesys.com >>about poor documentation, etc., .... >> >>The new reiser4 snapshot (against 2.6.5-rc2) is available at >> >>http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.03.26/ >> >> > > > > >
-- Hans
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |