Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 29 Mar 2004 08:59:14 -0800 (PST) | From | markw@osdl ... | Subject | Re: Reiser4 needs more testers |
| |
I've run through another test on STP with the latest snapshot against reiser4 and reiserfs for comparison. Reiser4 still seems to be lagging behind reiserfs in our DBT-2 workload (the bigger number is better in the metric):
metric url to test results ------ --------------------------------- reiser4 1208 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290774/ reiserfs 1819 http://khack.osdl.org/stp/290775/
Mark
On 26 Mar, Hans Reiser wrote: > We have one NFS related bug remaining, and one mmap all of memory > related bug (and performance issue) that you can hit using iozone. We > will fix both of these in next week's snapshot, they were both multi-day > bug fixes. When they are fixed, unless users/distros find bugs next > week we will submit it for inclusion in the -mm and then the official > kernel. > > We hope it is now fairly stable for average users if you avoid those two > issues (we need to get rid of those dire warnings about its > stability...., we will remember that next snapshot....;-) ) > > We need a lot more real user testers, because we have run out of scripts > that can crash it, and there are distros that would like to ship it > soon. Please also complain to vitaly@namesys.com and ramon@namesys.com > about poor documentation, etc., .... > > The new reiser4 snapshot (against 2.6.5-rc2) is available at > > http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.03.26/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |