Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 31 Dec 2004 00:38:22 -0500 | From | Daniel Jacobowitz <> | Subject | Re: ptrace single-stepping change breaks Wine |
| |
On Thu, Dec 30, 2004 at 09:05:01PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Dec 2004, Jesse Allen wrote: > > > > Well I tried this patch and it works. > > Goodie. Are there other known problems with silly copy-protection > schemes? It migth be worth testing. > > However: > > > Since I cannot spot any issue, the patch looks good. Are there any > > other test cases? > > Yes. It seems I broke "strace" with it. Probably the difference in system > call trace reporting that Dan Jacobowitz already pointed out. > > Now, that should be easily handled by just separating out the cases of > system call tracing and debug trap handling, and using the old silly code > for system calls. I'd prefer a cleaner approach, but that seems to be the > sane thing to do for now.
Strace doesn't use PTRACE_SETOPTIONS as far as I can tell... so it must be something different.
-- Daniel Jacobowitz - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |